Schedule of assets that names the property
The exhibit attached to the trust listing the home, the account, or the business interest. The single strongest piece of evidence in most petitions.

Heggstad Petitions · Section 850
A Heggstad petition asks a California judge to confirm an asset belongs to a trust even though the title was never updated during life. Bob has filed Section 850 petitions in Santa Clara County and across California since the procedure became routine.
A Heggstad petition is a California court request asking a judge to confirm that an asset belongs to a trust, even though the asset was never formally transferred into the trust during the owner’s lifetime. California Probate Code Section 850 permits these petitions. They are common when a settlor signs a trust but never funds a specific property, account, or business interest. Most uncontested petitions resolve in 60 to 120 days, faster and far less expensive than a full probate of the same asset.
Where the Name Comes From
California Court of Appeal · First District
Estate of Heggstad
16 Cal. App. 4th 943 (1993)
The court held that a written declaration by the settlor identifying property as part of the trust is sufficient to make the property a trust asset, even where the deed was never recorded into the trust’s name.
California Probate Code Section 850 now codifies the procedure. A trustee, beneficiary, or other interested person can ask the court for an order conveying property to or from a trust. Heggstad petitions are the most common use of the statute.

The Short Version
Someone signs a revocable trust. The trust’s schedule of assets lists the house, the brokerage account, or the LLC interest. But the deed, the account title, or the membership certificate is never updated. When the person dies, the asset is technically not in the trust.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to fix that. The judge reviews the trust, the schedule, the pour-over will, and the surrounding records, then signs an order confirming the asset belonged to the trust all along.
The order is recorded against real property or presented to the financial institution. The asset passes under the trust the way the settlor intended. No full probate.
When the Procedure Fits
The setup is consistent. The trust is well drafted. The schedule lists the asset. Something interrupted the funding step. The remedy is a Section 850 petition.
The trust schedule lists the home. The grant deed is still in the settlor’s individual name. The most common Heggstad fact pattern in Santa Clara County.
An account was opened after the trust was funded and titled in the settlor’s individual name without trust language.
The business interest was supposed to move into the trust. The operating agreement was amended, but the assignment instrument was never executed.
Where the trust was the intended beneficiary of an insurance policy or annuity and the carrier still lists an individual or “estate of,” the fix may be a Section 850 petition depending on the carrier.
The Evidence Dossier
A Heggstad petition lives or dies on the record that existed before death, not on after-the-fact testimony. The court is looking for an unambiguous statement of the settlor’s intent. Some categories of evidence carry far more weight than others.
The exhibit attached to the trust listing the home, the account, or the business interest. The single strongest piece of evidence in most petitions.
The companion will that funnels overlooked assets into the trust at death. Corroborates the intent the schedule shows.
Often signed alongside the trust and presented to title companies. When it names the property, the record reads as one continuous expression of intent.
Letters and emails from the original planning attorney that describe the trust funding the family was building. Helpful, but secondary to the trust documents themselves.
Account legacies and recording histories that line up with how the schedule describes the asset. Useful corroboration when the schedule itself is partly ambiguous.
Affidavits from beneficiaries saying the settlor “always meant” the property to be in the trust. Considered, but rarely sufficient on its own. The court looks for the paper.
Bob has filed petitions on both ends of the spectrum. When the schedule is clear, the petition is straightforward. When it is silent or the asset was acquired after the trust was funded, the petition is harder and the file review at the start matters more.
From File Review to Signed Order
Five steps. Most uncontested petitions resolve in 60 to 120 days from filing. Bob handles each step himself, from the first read of the trust through the recorded order.
File review. Bob reads the trust, the schedule of assets, the pour-over will, and the asset records, and gives you a written assessment and a fee estimate.
Petition drafted. The petition states the relief sought, recites the evidence of intent, and attaches the supporting documents.
Filed and noticed. Filed in the Probate Division of the county Superior Court. Notice is served on every interested party as required by Probate Code Section 851.
Hearing. Most uncontested petitions are heard 30 to 60 days after filing. Bob attends the hearing.
Order recorded. Once the court signs the order, it is certified and recorded against the property for real estate, or presented to the financial institution for accounts and securities.
The Alternative
When the evidence supports trust ownership, a Section 850 petition is almost always faster and less expensive than running the asset through full California probate. When the evidence is thin, probate is the path forward.
Full California probate
Last resortHeggstad petition
Preferred pathWhere It Is Filed
A Heggstad petition is filed in the county where the trustee lives or where the property is located. Bob files most petitions in the Probate Division of the Santa Clara County Superior Court, in the Downtown San Jose courthouse.
When the trustee or the property is elsewhere in California, Bob handles the filing in that county too. Petitions have been filed for clients in San Mateo, Contra Costa, Alameda, and Monterey counties.

Why Bob
The result depends on a careful read of the trust, the schedule of assets, and the surrounding records. The work rewards specialization. Bob has practiced estate planning, trust administration, and probate work in Santa Clara County since 1980.
Keep Reading

When the petition you need is not about ownership but about changing the terms of an irrevocable trust under Probate Code Section 15403 or 15409.
Read more
Most Heggstad petitions arrive as part of a larger administration. Bob handles the petition and the administration in a single engagement.
Read moreHeggstad Petitions FAQ
Plain-language answers on cost, timing, evidence, denial, and how a Heggstad petition fits next to probate and trust modification. If something is missing, bring it to your meeting with Bob.
Don’t see your question?
Email or call the office, or bring it to your free Preliminary Planning Session.
Ask Bob directlyA Heggstad petition is a court request asking a judge to confirm that an asset belongs to a trust, even though the asset was never formally transferred into the trust during the owner’s lifetime. California Probate Code Section 850 permits these petitions. The procedure takes its name from the 1993 case Estate of Heggstad.
Total cost depends on the asset, the supporting documents available, and whether anyone contests the petition. Court filing fees in Santa Clara County are set by the court schedule. Attorney fees vary with complexity. Bob will give you a written fee estimate after reviewing the trust and the asset documents at the initial meeting.
Most uncontested Heggstad petitions in Santa Clara County resolve in roughly 60 to 120 days from filing. The hearing is typically set 30 to 60 days after the petition is filed, with additional time for notice to interested parties. Contested petitions take longer. Bob will give you a timeline estimate after reviewing the file.
Self-represented petitioners can file Section 850 petitions, but the procedural requirements are exacting. The notice provisions, the evidentiary standard for proving the settlor’s intent, and the form of the proposed order all matter. A defective petition can be denied, and a denied petition can lead to a probate proceeding for the same asset. Most clients hire a specialist to file these.
California Probate Code Section 850 is the statute that authorizes a trustee, beneficiary, or other interested person to petition the court for an order conveying property to or from a trust or estate. Heggstad petitions are one common use. Section 850 also covers other claims involving title to property held in or claimed by a fiduciary.
A Heggstad petition asks the court to confirm an asset already belongs to an existing trust. A probate is a court-supervised administration of a decedent’s estate when assets pass under a will or by intestacy. A Heggstad petition is faster and less expensive than probate when the evidence supports it. When the evidence does not support trust ownership, probate is the alternative.
Maybe. The question is whether your parent intended to fund the trust with the asset and simply did not complete the paperwork. A signed trust, a schedule of assets that lists the property, and contemporaneous estate planning documents all help establish that intent. If the evidence supports trust ownership, a Heggstad petition may resolve the issue. Bob will review the file and tell you which path fits.
Yes. The court denies a Heggstad petition when the evidence does not establish that the settlor intended the asset to be part of the trust. Common reasons for denial include a missing schedule of assets, contradictory deed records, or beneficiary designations that name someone other than the trust. A denied petition leaves probate as the path forward.
Heggstad petitions for Santa Clara County residents are filed in the Probate Division of the Santa Clara County Superior Court. The Probate Division is located at the Downtown Superior Courthouse in San Jose. Bob handles filings, hearings, and orders for clients across the county.
A Heggstad petition confirms ownership of an asset by an existing trust. A trust modification petition asks the court to change the terms of an irrevocable trust. The two are different procedures with different evidentiary standards. Bob handles both. The right tool depends on what you need the court to do.
Next Step
The first meeting is a Plan Design Meeting. Bob reads the trust and the asset records, confirms whether a Section 850 petition is the right path, and gives you a written fee estimate.
Bob is one of less than 1% of California attorneys certified as a specialist by the State Bar.